For the perfect buffer between E and F, I have a concept that can be called
by an E word or an F word, effeminacy or femininity. Both words refer to the nature, attributes,
behavior, mannerisms, style, and gender roles associated with women. When referring to a woman with these traits,
feminine is used, when referring to a man they are called effeminate. This is a very broad topic and I am bound to
leave a lot out so please bear with me.
I’m sure you all know this, but I would be remiss if
I didn’t define and cover what is considered feminine/effeminate. What is considered feminine/effeminate depends
on social context, culture, and time (Elizabethan men wearing lace was
considered masculine, for example). That
being said, gentleness, empathy, sensitivity, caring, compassion, nurturing, deference
and sexual passiveness are usually considered feminine/effeminate personality
traits. To what extent these traits are inherent
or learned through socialization is a matter of great debate. Presentation and appearance such as long
hair, cosmetics, female clothing, and an emphasis on physical beauty are almost
always considered feminine/effeminate.
The professional feminine social role has traditionally been confined to
the home or the nurturing/helping jobs like nurses, teachers, and
secretaries.
Effeminate men are usually far
less accepted then masculine women. Effeminacy
is usually pejorative and implies passivity, and weakness, and homosexuality. Saying gay men are effeminate is inaccurate. Historically camp, drag, and swish have been
part of gay culture; but so are Castro Clones and Bears, who are decidedly masculine. Men who are interested in fashion have been
called dandies and fops but those are usually labels they call themselves whereas, others call a man effeminate.
Second wave feminists considered femininity to be an
artificial social construct to keep women subordinate and objectified since
power and authority are considered very masculine. Modern, “lipstick feminists” counter that
this devalues the feminine identity. They claim the symbols of femininity are not
inherently subjugating and can even be empowering. Julia Serano writes (and I agree) that because
society is sexist, femininity is seen through a male lens and interpreted as
being less important or frivolous. She
feels that equality of the sexes will never be achieved until femininity is
empowered rather than despised (including by some feminists). She also claims that parts of femininity and
masculinity are inherent but not biologically derived, they precede
socialization and supersede biological sex.
What does this have to do with intersex? There are certainly feminine and masculine
intersex people. Like everyone, we have
the right to identify and live as we see fit.
If you believe gendered behavior is biologically determined you would
conclude that most intersex people must be fairly androgynous. Feminine (or
masculine) intersex people obviously disprove this. That being said, I object to intersex people
being used to prove some gender ideology, its dehumanizing. Leave comments, let me know if I missed
something important about femininity/effeminacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment